I think the color is not derived by powers... and the SC1 images don't can be considered (non so come si dice in inglese) attendibili. A clear exemple is Overmind's Eye.
Should be the opposite, since the real Starcraft is SC1. So if they decide in LOTV to make Raynor a transvestite with a yellow wig looking like Devine from Pink Flamingos or Platinette, then we should change it in our remake?
All that words... I saw this soo much Times,this is so BM,is not true that 1st is alwais the best,look at crash bandicoot-prototype-Diablo-Batman games-And other series... The first chapter wasn't the best,the following chapters increased the quality because the first chapter was "too young".I really hate people that spam thing like "Omg XXX 1 was the BEST,the other chapters sucks" is not alwais so,often it is but not alwais... And i don't understand why sc1 should be better of sc2,ok HotS story is crap,but on the complex sc2 is better,the balance is fine,because all say OMG SC2 IS IMB4 SC1 WAS BALANCED!! only because they are noob and lose,if we look at the story of sc1 he needed like 10 years to find the perfect balance...
The story:sc1 is a 90's games,sc2 is a 2010's Game is obvious that the style is changed,i don't like too some Holliwood things on sc2,but Anyway they are not so bad,WoL had am interesting story,brave choices on some parts and in fact a lot of people said "OMG this story is crap BW was the best!" but i personally enjoied it,there was a lot of surprises.Maybe for these critiques the story of HotS was more prudent but we discussed yet of it.
Technically is so much better sc2.Also the maps are better,i was so tired of these mega maps of Bw.
So please don't say that sc1 is the best only because you didn't like the story,this is a really dumb thing...
Yeah, Def is right, and in SC1 the portrait is not "affidabili" for the low graphic, for exemple, Raynor is completly different from SC2, but we know from the OFFICIAL artwork he look like SC2 in SC1 too, and the Overmind have the eye completly different from SC1, so we must do the models with SC2 style (other exemple si the Nerazim tech have the same design of Khalai tech)
Didn't say the first chapter is always the best. For example I prefer Ghostbusters 2, Aliens 2, Terminator 2 to the first chapters, I prefer Doom 2 to Doom 1 and Diablo 2 to Diablo 1, but I mean that the first chapter should be the canon, the origin of a franchise. If someone decide to make Superman with a red costume, make it blonde and making it from planet Mars instead of Krypton, do you consider it canon in place of the original Clark Kent? I hope not! :D
Lo scrivo in italiano così ci capiamo meglio, sennĂ² sembra una commedia greca: per number one non intendevo il migliore, ma capostipite, numero uno, il primo insomma.
Ho capito Torr, ma in SC1 la grafica era estremamente limitata, quindi non possiamo affidarci a SC1 nell'aspetto fisico ma negli artwork e in SC1, anche GN per esempio ha fatto Duran basandosi sull'artwork e non sul gioco, per questo voglio che Artanis abbia gli occhi azzurri, perchè in SC2 lui ha gli occhi azzurri, persino nella wikia di SC nella tabella viene descritto con gli occhi celesti tralasciando completamente il suo aspetto in SC1 perchè non affidabile a causa della bassa grafica.
Ah ok perchè siamo andati giĂ¹ pesante coll'off-topic
Infatti si è passati da Artanis a Superman ahah. Non credo sia l'aspetto grafico, non era un gioco a 16 colori, molto probabilmente gli han cambiato gli occhi perchè gli piacevano di piĂ¹ azzurri dato che il 90% dei Protoss li ha gialli.
In terms of this project, we're trying to be as faithful to the original as possible. Meaning the original is the final authority in terms of "canon", not SC2.
In terms of this project, we're trying to be as faithful to the original as possible. Meaning the original is the final authority in terms of "canon", not SC2.
How I explicate to Torr, in SC1 the graphic is very low, so a lot of things is change, for exemple the Overmind's eye, Raynor is completly different, Artanis'e eyes, Nerazim tech (in SC1 the Nerazim tech is golden like Khalai) ecc... but this is for the low graphic, canonicaly the Blizzard considered the physical aspect from SC2 (for this the artworks of SC1 the characters are like SC2) for this I prefer Artanis have blue eyes ;)
Nerazim tech (in SC1 the Nerazim tech is golden like Khalai)
What Nerazim tech do you refer to more exactly?The only gameplay Nerazim tech unit/structure in StarCraft1/BroodWar is the Corsair, as far as I can remember(DTs are not tech, but rather combat soldier).
I don't think they made the Corsair golden because they couldn't make it silver graphic wise, but rather because it looked out of place for it being the only silver grey protoss unit. And yes, it looks out of place in the remake too.
If you want a role explanation I'd say that after the refuge of protoss from Aiur, the Khalai and the Nerazim put effort together to create a new ship. The Khalai created the design and produced the corsair, since they are better architects/engineers, while the Nerazim trained the pilots since their quicker and stealth-ier.
So this is how the Corsair was made, a fast assault ship designed and produced by the Khalai and piloted by the Nerazim. But this is just my speculation.
Also this is official Blizzard artwork made by Peter Lee and as you can see there are three golden Corsairs behind the left Colossus so I'm inclined to belive Blizzard wanted to make the corsair golden in the first place and they look better this way IMO.
i can't, I have problem with the other pc, so i can't edit nothing for now... :S
Va bene se apro una cartella su DB chiamata DarkSkorpyon Feedback? PosterĂ² li le immagini coi bugs
fai pure
Should be the opposite, since the real Starcraft is SC1. So if they decide in LOTV to make Raynor a transvestite with a yellow wig looking like Devine from Pink Flamingos or Platinette, then we should change it in our remake?
"The real StarCraft is SC1" is better if i shut up... "Facepalm"
What's wrong with that sentence? In every movie, book, comic, videogame the real, the original is the number one, always.
All that words... I saw this soo much Times,this is so BM,is not true that 1st is alwais the best,look at crash bandicoot-prototype-Diablo-Batman games-And other series... The first chapter wasn't the best,the following chapters increased the quality because the first chapter was "too young".I really hate people that spam thing like "Omg XXX 1 was the BEST,the other chapters sucks" is not alwais so,often it is but not alwais... And i don't understand why sc1 should be better of sc2,ok HotS story is crap,but on the complex sc2 is better,the balance is fine,because all say OMG SC2 IS IMB4 SC1 WAS BALANCED!! only because they are noob and lose,if we look at the story of sc1 he needed like 10 years to find the perfect balance...
Yeah, Def is right, and in SC1 the portrait is not "affidabili" for the low graphic, for exemple, Raynor is completly different from SC2, but we know from the OFFICIAL artwork he look like SC2 in SC1 too, and the Overmind have the eye completly different from SC1, so we must do the models with SC2 style (other exemple si the Nerazim tech have the same design of Khalai tech)
Didn't say the first chapter is always the best. For example I prefer Ghostbusters 2, Aliens 2, Terminator 2 to the first chapters, I prefer Doom 2 to Doom 1 and Diablo 2 to Diablo 1, but I mean that the first chapter should be the canon, the origin of a franchise. If someone decide to make Superman with a red costume, make it blonde and making it from planet Mars instead of Krypton, do you consider it canon in place of the original Clark Kent? I hope not! :D
Lo scrivo in italiano così ci capiamo meglio, sennĂ² sembra una commedia greca: per number one non intendevo il migliore, ma capostipite, numero uno, il primo insomma.
Ah ok perchè siamo andati giĂ¹ pesante coll'off-topic
Ho capito Torr, ma in SC1 la grafica era estremamente limitata, quindi non possiamo affidarci a SC1 nell'aspetto fisico ma negli artwork e in SC1, anche GN per esempio ha fatto Duran basandosi sull'artwork e non sul gioco, per questo voglio che Artanis abbia gli occhi azzurri, perchè in SC2 lui ha gli occhi azzurri, persino nella wikia di SC nella tabella viene descritto con gli occhi celesti tralasciando completamente il suo aspetto in SC1 perchè non affidabile a causa della bassa grafica.
Infatti si è passati da Artanis a Superman ahah. Non credo sia l'aspetto grafico, non era un gioco a 16 colori, molto probabilmente gli han cambiato gli occhi perchè gli piacevano di piĂ¹ azzurri dato che il 90% dei Protoss li ha gialli.
In terms of this project, we're trying to be as faithful to the original as possible. Meaning the original is the final authority in terms of "canon", not SC2.
Yeah :D
@Miles07: Go
How I explicate to Torr, in SC1 the graphic is very low, so a lot of things is change, for exemple the Overmind's eye, Raynor is completly different, Artanis'e eyes, Nerazim tech (in SC1 the Nerazim tech is golden like Khalai) ecc... but this is for the low graphic, canonicaly the Blizzard considered the physical aspect from SC2 (for this the artworks of SC1 the characters are like SC2) for this I prefer Artanis have blue eyes ;)
Blizzard said that they want to do models more similar to the artworks and in fact we have it
@Zarxiel93: Go
What Nerazim tech do you refer to more exactly?The only gameplay Nerazim tech unit/structure in StarCraft1/BroodWar is the Corsair, as far as I can remember(DTs are not tech, but rather combat soldier).
I don't think they made the Corsair golden because they couldn't make it silver graphic wise, but rather because it looked out of place for it being the only silver grey protoss unit. And yes, it looks out of place in the remake too.
If you want a role explanation I'd say that after the refuge of protoss from Aiur, the Khalai and the Nerazim put effort together to create a new ship. The Khalai created the design and produced the corsair, since they are better architects/engineers, while the Nerazim trained the pilots since their quicker and stealth-ier.
So this is how the Corsair was made, a fast assault ship designed and produced by the Khalai and piloted by the Nerazim. But this is just my speculation.
Also this is official Blizzard artwork made by Peter Lee and as you can see there are three golden Corsairs behind the left Colossus so I'm inclined to belive Blizzard wanted to make the corsair golden in the first place and they look better this way IMO.
Mmmh Bogdan is right,we should use Golden Corsairs