Abundance
Both players have a close natural expansion with 3 optional expansions. 3 high yield expansions to the south. 1 which is highly fortified with destructible rocks.
Still working on bounds and small tweaks.
Let me know your thoughts and comments!
Comments
-
_ForgeUser4550011 Owner
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jun 15, 2010Thanks for the feedback! Keep in mind this is my first rough draft of a sc2 map. I am thinking about taking the 2 north expos and making them into just 1 gold expo, with 1 big ramp or 2 ramps with destructible rocks. Then taking the south corner expos and making them normal yields and and reworking the whole middle south expo, it is a bit bottle necked with the double ramps there. But it is something to fight over and defend. Leaving your main/natural open for attack. I agree that the expos are easy to defend. I would like to open up and make 2 routes into the east/west expos and bring them closer to the center of the map, making them harder to defend. Thanks again!
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jun 15, 2010defend 4 expansions by securing one area? certainly explains the title abundance huh.
is a gold down there really justified with 4 easily defendable places? also, if theres a gold down there on your side thats just a scoot away from your main defending area, is the center expansion really worth anything? r u expcting super late game?
also, the rush distances are extremely close. how do u see that playing into the dynamics, considering the abundance (easy defensibility) of expansions? will it result in potential cheesy/aggressive play like steps of war, but if both sides survive, was what you saw intensely high tense standoffs fueled by four abundant expansions, like a very tight, small pressured bottle that's being heated?
love the gigantic mineral doodads that go along with the theme.