So how about you give some arguments, hmmm? Your first post contained them, but (as you addmited) it was a mistake. You called me an idiot in the next two posts, that doesn't count as arguments.
Please anyone, do explain to me how it isn't a disgrace for a democratic country to still maintain a King, Queen and and a whole royal family? Don't tell me what their "powers" are, tell me why they should have them.
Also, just to clear things up: I do not burn gays. Although I am an atheist, so I eat infants on occasion, but who doesn't have small quirks, right?
This is completely ignorant. They have a purpose. They have responsibilities. You could find these with just a few seconds of searching on the internet.
Hey, I found it! It says they're a government sanctioned Paris Hilton. Royal party clowns that appear to make people feel better. Even parasites have a purpose.
By "responsibility" I meant stuff that they can't just abandon, like jobs. You know, working to support a family, pay taxes, payments on the house, car, kids education.
Their "responsibility" is to look pretty, award medals and lay flowers on monuments. And they can just say "screw it" and go back to their castle.
They're in afghanastan helping the U.S. How is that not a responsibility and not doing anything at all?
The Royal Family is out there, in their camo gear, trying to flush bin-laden out of his cave, eh? I guess they use the queen to disarm minefields, because what mine would dare explode under the damned Queen of England!
The English monarchy is a figurehead. They have no power, they are just there to look pretty and be in the news for getting married.
Yeah, I know, they're like mascots. They don't do anything at all, don't have any responsibilities and get to live in a palace just because they're "royalty" :S
@iSaintx: Go
So how about you give some arguments, hmmm? Your first post contained them, but (as you addmited) it was a mistake. You called me an idiot in the next two posts, that doesn't count as arguments.
Please anyone, do explain to me how it isn't a disgrace for a democratic country to still maintain a King, Queen and and a whole royal family? Don't tell me what their "powers" are, tell me why they should have them.
Also, just to clear things up: I do not burn gays. Although I am an atheist, so I eat infants on occasion, but who doesn't have small quirks, right?
@Eiviyn: Go
No, I think I'll wait until you make a 3rd post saying "you're too stupid to understand".
I have to say, that is the most compelling argument I've heard :D Does it outweigh the cost of supporting their parasite lifestyle and castles?
Hey, I found it! It says they're a government sanctioned Paris Hilton. Royal party clowns that appear to make people feel better. Even parasites have a purpose.
By "responsibility" I meant stuff that they can't just abandon, like jobs. You know, working to support a family, pay taxes, payments on the house, car, kids education. Their "responsibility" is to look pretty, award medals and lay flowers on monuments. And they can just say "screw it" and go back to their castle.
The Royal Family is out there, in their camo gear, trying to flush bin-laden out of his cave, eh? I guess they use the queen to disarm minefields, because what mine would dare explode under the damned Queen of England!
@Mozared: Go
I am sorry to hear that. I hope your country get rid of monarchy as soon as possible.
Yeah, I know, they're like mascots. They don't do anything at all, don't have any responsibilities and get to live in a palace just because they're "royalty" :S
Middle Ages that way - - - ->
I'd send them a card saying:
21st century and countries still have kings, queens and princes... really...