Some science to fill or..rather highlight gaps in evolution theory(that its broken). Kudos if you understand it(not really complicated) and can answer/make sense of everything by yourself(Which I mean, you should be able to anyway).
If philosophy/religion/wisdom had any merit at all beyond idle speculation, you'd have one school of thought for the entire planet that people would have all come to independently of each other.
Not really. Science is the same. You telling me the level of scientific advancement for one group will necessitate into a reality for another group in an eventuality?. Possible, but not probable, and there are many factors. The same goes for religion/wisdom/philosophy. Major groups share very common collective thoughts(A God/s, Law of Karma, distinction between good and evil etc). The rest is the result of cultural difference and whatever else.
Luckily, science doesn't waste its time trying to validate any of these hypotheses, but merely ignores them.
Because it cant..
Although there does seem to be some evidence for things like past life regression, and some valid scientific endeavours in that field.
So yea, Science is slow, but eventually it might get to understanding and explaining the 'important" aspects of life. "Might". Hence belief serves a great role.
You imply that religion answers ultimate origin? I always thought it does the contrary.
Science cant and might never be able to answer everything(All we know is knowledge understood and tangible from our senses, You cant go beyond that) . From the dawn of understanding, Its never even come close to answering the important questions of life. All it does is discover inventions, medicines etc, and explains the process behind phenomena. Useful in its own right nonetheless, but that it might have limitations is not far fetched.
I believe in Karma, Re-incarnation(to a degree) and similar concepts like that which is relegated on religion. Science cant answer that now, and might never so I dont care about waiting until the day it does when my life is now.
The universes runs on a cause<>effect system, There is no problem is believing human action might have a macrocosm effect thats not easily perceived. Surely it would justify many problems in the world that seem random and unfair in human life yet in a perfectly designed and ordered universe. This is where philosophy and wisdom(logic) comes in, and Science takes a backseat or tries to validate it.
Dr. Sylvester James Gates, Jr. Presents Evidence For Intelligent Design:
Atheism is an anachronism from a simpler time.
Well, to the understanding mind its fairly obvious that intelligent design is both real and the result of an higher/intelligent creator or agent. But that link explains it interestingly enough.
Also the other guy is apparently agnostic ;
Atheist is just another word for..I would say, 'the unaware or arrogant'. Not as an insult, but the disability(or inability) to appreciate and comprehend what a fine work of masterpiece the universe is. In all complexities and function. That to deny it was created/designed/programmed by an intelligent creator is profoundly absurd. Reducing human intelligence to something of like a chimp. Now, who or what this creator personifies is another matter all together and debatable, but that there was needed an intelligent creator is an irrefutable given.
Your comment is strange as to why you compare it to a religion. (Trolling?)
Have you seen his credentials? That guy is a genius and over accomplished in many fields of science. On what grounds or counter evidence do you make your assertion(with emotional bias I might add)?
The obvious reality of the soul/consciousness will eventually be realized/modelled by real science(the older models and theories are broken with holes and are not sufficient). What religion(and most simple logical individuals) have known all along as common sense will be mapped as a standard truth at some point.
Its a shame for objective reasoning when some people pigeon-hold their understanding on dogmatic beliefs.
@Forge_User_59026135: Go
Or the fact that we've found pretty much all the intermediates in the fossil record: homo habilis, homo erectus, homo cepranensis, homo rhodesiensis, neanderthal, etc. You can go to a museum and see their bones. If that's not proof I don't know what is.
@FDFederation: Go
Some science to fill or..rather highlight gaps in evolution theory(that its broken). Kudos if you understand it(not really complicated) and can answer/make sense of everything by yourself(Which I mean, you should be able to anyway).
http://evolutionfacts.com/Handbook%20TOC.htm
http://www.icr.org/article/260/
http://www.evanwiggs.com/articles/reasons.html#Reason1
http://www.emjc3.com/evolution.htm
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/20questions.html
Will also just drop this..
http://www.delusionresistance.org/creation/evoquotes.html
Edit: The above meme was something I found and not meant to be dramatic in anyway.
Not really. Science is the same. You telling me the level of scientific advancement for one group will necessitate into a reality for another group in an eventuality?. Possible, but not probable, and there are many factors. The same goes for religion/wisdom/philosophy. Major groups share very common collective thoughts(A God/s, Law of Karma, distinction between good and evil etc). The rest is the result of cultural difference and whatever else.
Because it cant..
Although there does seem to be some evidence for things like past life regression, and some valid scientific endeavours in that field.
So yea, Science is slow, but eventually it might get to understanding and explaining the 'important" aspects of life. "Might". Hence belief serves a great role.
Science cant and might never be able to answer everything(All we know is knowledge understood and tangible from our senses, You cant go beyond that) . From the dawn of understanding, Its never even come close to answering the important questions of life. All it does is discover inventions, medicines etc, and explains the process behind phenomena. Useful in its own right nonetheless, but that it might have limitations is not far fetched.
I believe in Karma, Re-incarnation(to a degree) and similar concepts like that which is relegated on religion. Science cant answer that now, and might never so I dont care about waiting until the day it does when my life is now.
The universes runs on a cause<>effect system, There is no problem is believing human action might have a macrocosm effect thats not easily perceived. Surely it would justify many problems in the world that seem random and unfair in human life yet in a perfectly designed and ordered universe. This is where philosophy and wisdom(logic) comes in, and Science takes a backseat or tries to validate it.
Well, to the understanding mind its fairly obvious that intelligent design is both real and the result of an higher/intelligent creator or agent. But that link explains it interestingly enough.
Also the other guy is apparently agnostic ;
Atheist is just another word for..I would say, 'the unaware or arrogant'. Not as an insult, but the disability(or inability) to appreciate and comprehend what a fine work of masterpiece the universe is. In all complexities and function. That to deny it was created/designed/programmed by an intelligent creator is profoundly absurd. Reducing human intelligence to something of like a chimp. Now, who or what this creator personifies is another matter all together and debatable, but that there was needed an intelligent creator is an irrefutable given.
Your comment is strange as to why you compare it to a religion. (Trolling?)
Have you seen his credentials? That guy is a genius and over accomplished in many fields of science. On what grounds or counter evidence do you make your assertion(with emotional bias I might add)?
The obvious reality of the soul/consciousness will eventually be realized/modelled by real science(the older models and theories are broken with holes and are not sufficient). What religion(and most simple logical individuals) have known all along as common sense will be mapped as a standard truth at some point.
Its a shame for objective reasoning when some people pigeon-hold their understanding on dogmatic beliefs.
@EternalWraith: Go
http://www.robertlanza.com/is-death-an-illusion-evidence-suggests-death-isnt-the-end/
http://www.robertlanza.com/do-we-have-a-soul-a-scientific-answer/
I like this site: http://www.sciencedaily.com/
Lol
Nope.
@Hookah604: Go
Thats all fake. I also found a bone in my backyard yesterday, Time to find others and combine and create obscure puzzles made to fit.
My addition to the science videos. Enjoy;p
Sane people know its nonsense;p.
Not science yea yea.
Herp derp?. Nah that never happened. No proof, no evidence, defies logic and reason too.
Means nothing. Chimps and humans also breathe air. Cool?
Fake and incorrect pseudo-science.