Yes. zenx1 knows more than foolish Blizzard of course. He should be in charge of designing future systems for every company in the world.
No, wait, Zenx1 is just a silly kid that suffers from nostalgia and a critical lack of understanding.
I`ll finish this conversation tomorrow.
Wc3 and its b.net 1.0 was good back then, but now its thrash. Failsky is probably being a drama queen as usual(nothing better to do) and exaggerating the situation(Haven`t see the vid yet).
WC3's interface and functionality on B-Net 1.0 feels more modern than SC2. That's the root of the problem. Many features were removed for the sake of "visually pleasing" aesthetics. So while 2.0 might look pretty, it has less functionality than its predecessor making it feel antiquated.
Your argument is needlessly hostile without any real reason to be. If you haven't watched the video, you really shouldn't be posting at all. You are horribly misinformed:
People can add you to their friends list without your knowledge and you can't prevent them from seeing when you're online. This directly undermines your reasons for supporting 2.0.
Chat commands created a standard across games. There is a reason why so many "modern" games have this as well. Nearly every MMO and most competitive games have them. Calling it "DOS prompt" really only shows that you don't understand this. Clicking multiple buttons and THEN typing is not faster than Enter > /[SOMETHING] text. I can whisper you 5 or 6 times before you can whisper me once.
If you don't want people to know what you're playing, Real ID only makes this worse. You can't hide yourself on Real ID. Anyone you add to this list can see what you're doing at ALL TIMES. That's exactly the opposite of what you claim to want, yet you think Real ID is a great feature.
Your argument makes it very clear that you don't understand how B-Net 1.0 or 2.0 works. I strongly advise you sit down and look them over more thoroughly before posting in here again. You have contradicted yourself every post in this thread and you admit to not taking the time to view the subject matter.
zenx1 may have a negative perspective, but at least he has taken the time to do his research.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
WC3's interface and functionality on B-Net 1.0 feels more modern than SC2. That's the root of the problem. Many features were removed for the sake of "visually pleasing" aesthetics. So while 2.0 might look pretty, it has less functionality than its predecessor making it feel antiquated.
Your argument is needlessly hostile without any real reason to be. If you haven't watched the video, you really shouldn't be posting at all. You are horribly misinformed:
Your argument makes it very clear that you don't understand how B-Net 1.0 or 2.0 works. I strongly advise you sit down and look them over more thoroughly before posting in here again. You have contradicted yourself every post in this thread and you admit to not taking the time to view the subject matter.
zenx1 may have a negative perspective, but at least he has taken the time to do his research.