Perfect for my purposes! I found Game Music - Zerg, et al, and in Sounds: Sound Assets I replaced the default music with the imported files. Thank you!
I would like to replace the Starcraft 2 music with Brood War music, such that terran players will only hear Brood War terran music, zerg players will only hear Brood War zerg music, and protoss players will only here Brood War protoss music. Currently, the trigger can play a soundtrack for all players regardless of species. I failed to find a function that return's the player's species.
I am still awaiting your explanation of evolution from your point of view.
Also, what is your view of homosexuality, since it doesn't seem to be stated on the picture of the ten commandments that you have posted.
You have equal chances of being one or the other. I didn't realize the site was running low on forum real estate. That's probably the reason why you never did address them.
You get offended quite easily. I'm so glad you give me credit for having at least some intelligence. :)
"discussing aspects about it to you would be a waste of my time" is a phrase used by very many pretentious people/egomaniacs. It just shows how little faith you have in your argument. You obviously didn't think it was a waste of your time to bother replying considering that the internet forum affords you all the time to think about and create a reply at your leisure.
I just like to play devil's advocate against religious people. I place my trust in things that can be measured in several ways, from which data can be gathered, etc. I also place my trust in explanations that can be verified by experimentation/duplicated by any curious individual. If there are multiple verifiable explanations, I apportion my trust according to the amount of data supporting each explanation. I do not place my trust in things for which there is little evidence to support. Technically, in the absence of measurements/verifiability, all speculations remain possible and have equal probability of being true and untrue (uniform probability distribution), until technology allows us to make better measurements and helps further experimentation. As a philosophical thought game, it is fun to discuss possibilities of speculations to be true and false and the implications.
How do you know that the Pythagorean view of the universe isn't the truth? Everything appears to be defined by numerical values, hence everything is literally made of numbers.
Democritus, an ancient Greek pagan, apparently "prophesized the existence of the atom", but no one ever calls him a prophet.
You've never experienced the Flying Spaghetti Monster because your faith in him is not strong enough. Once you open your mind to his noodliness, he will grant you your own pasta strainer pirate hat.
On a side note, no one can really disprove that Clint Eastwood actually spoke with Invisible Obama.
You don't see the hypocrisies in your inconsistent interpretations of Bronze Age folklore? You are making literal interpretations one moment, then twisting words/meanings the next moment. If you haven't seen god's penis, then you can't really be sure "he" is the correct pronoun to use. More truth exists in evolution than in creationism. Humans have a lot in common with chimps, as well as the rest of the animal kingdom: conflicts over resources, territory, mates, etc.
The Holy Church of Ceiling Cat is obviously the only one and true religion. How could any force stand against his mighty army of Bread Cat Minions and Peek-a-Boo Kittens? Ceiling Cat maded dem hoomons to be survantz to catz everywherez.
Because of the electrons' quantized energy states. If the multiverse hypothesis is correct, a parallel earth would indeed exist with red atmosphere because the electron's properties in that universe are slightly different. If multiverse is correct, there would also be universes in which parameters are so different that life would never have developed, let alone matter coming into existence. Science is always about finding why something works the way it does; hence research into physics. When ever you ask why and science can't explain why, you automatically cite it as proof of divine intention, when in reality science can't explain why because of technological limitations; just like when the technology wasn't available in 5000 BC to help explain that eclipses weren't the results of demons swallowing the sun. We currently do not have the technology to detect other universes, hence multiverse remains a hypothesis, just as is your definition of a omnipotent divinity. As technology advances, new tools will allow science to explain why. You can't be more honest and sincere than a scientist who is trying to discover why the universe works the way it does and trying to disseminate the findings to the public. Religion only requires blind faith/trust in doctrine and dogma. Religious people often take offense when science finds something that contradicts and invalidates religious beliefs; religious people view science as an affront on their religion. Many religious people assume humans have a soul, that there is an afterlife, etc, but science has yet to find any evidence to support those hypotheses.
Weren't you trying to show that god's genocides were plans to avoid a greater evil?
If you can misrepresent/misunderstand my point of view, which is written in modern English, and we are both from the United States, why would you think you can understand the biblical stories, which were originally written in ancient Hebrew dialect, then translated to Greek, then translated to Latin, then translated to old English?
The chances of finding god is that same as finding the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It's really quit dishonest to tell people to trust in something that may not even exist. It's also quite dishonest to say that the unknown is unknowable because of divine intention.
@GnaReffotsirk: Go
"We can only trust. And this is where faith comes in. "
Right, because faith is defined as believing in something for which there is zero factual evidence supporting it (i.e. faith in god, faith in afterlife, faith in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, etc.) You seem to be attributing the occurrence of events as the action of a conscious omnipotent being, and of course, you don't have any evidence for this. If your defense, you would probably say that humans cannot understand because it is beyond their comprehension, a totally lazy and vague attempt at explanation.
In reality, your speculation that events are ultimately controlled and connected to a greater purpose, is misconception of coincidence, randomness, and probability.
When an event, usually traumatizing, occurs, people have a natural tendency/curiosity to understand why it happened, they tend to seek what ever explanation gives them the most comfort because of the brain's need for endorphins. It's easiest for those people to turn to speculation/religion/conspiracies/etc when the facts contradict their own relative perceptions of the reality of the events. That's why so many religious people attribute disasters to wrath of god, instead of to failed policies to prepare for disasters, or blindness in heeding the evidence of pre-disaster warnings. Lack of understanding/inability to understand the factual evidence leads to faith in religious explanations. Advances in science and technology have allowed us to comprehend so many things (i.e. materials science, quantum mechanics, relativity).
"Why is the sky blue?"
"Because god is the decider."
"Wrong. The sky is blue because the gas molecules in the atmosphere causes light to "scatter". The blue spectrum of light has enough energy to excite the electrons in the molecules. When the electrons go back to the ground state, the energy is re-emitted back as blue light."
"How do you know this?"
"Because of scientific experiments."
"Why does the moon orbit the earth?"
"Because it's the moon's punishment for stealing cheese from the sun."
Which is why NOT the entire nation believes in hocus pocus biblical stories. Those stories have as much fact as historical fiction at best. A lot of Germans, one might even say the entire nation, believed in "Mein Kampf", another book that was written so strongly, and look at the outcome. The whole world also used to believe the sun and the moon chased each other around earth, explaining why the sun and moon rarely appear in the sky together, and that the stars revolved around earth, proving that earth was the center of the universe.
0
@JacktheArcher: Go
Perfect for my purposes! I found Game Music - Zerg, et al, and in Sounds: Sound Assets I replaced the default music with the imported files. Thank you!
0
I would like to replace the Starcraft 2 music with Brood War music, such that terran players will only hear Brood War terran music, zerg players will only hear Brood War zerg music, and protoss players will only here Brood War protoss music. Currently, the trigger can play a soundtrack for all players regardless of species. I failed to find a function that return's the player's species.
0
@Gradius12: Go
I totally agree with you.
0
@Saltpeter: Go
And/or with the use of measuring devices.
@EternalWraith: Go
I am still awaiting your explanation of evolution from your point of view. Also, what is your view of homosexuality, since it doesn't seem to be stated on the picture of the ten commandments that you have posted.
0
@EternalWraith: Go
You don't seem to detect the slightest hints of satire? Even Rosie O'Donnell can have "manly" attributes.
"I dont want to be responsible for proving to you how little you know about the theory(or most scientists)" - Pretentious? Hubris?
First, you tell me what you believe you know about evolution and then we'll go from there.
0
@Eiviyn: Go
You have equal chances of being one or the other. I didn't realize the site was running low on forum real estate. That's probably the reason why you never did address them.
0
@EternalWraith: Go
You get offended quite easily. I'm so glad you give me credit for having at least some intelligence. :) "discussing aspects about it to you would be a waste of my time" is a phrase used by very many pretentious people/egomaniacs. It just shows how little faith you have in your argument. You obviously didn't think it was a waste of your time to bother replying considering that the internet forum affords you all the time to think about and create a reply at your leisure.
@Eiviyn: Go
Indoctrination...
Religious people tend to be too deluded to realize the effects/symptoms of indoctrination, just like Chuck Norris.
@Hookah604: Go
:)
0
@Saltpeter: Go
:)
0
@GnaReffotsirk: Go
Ramen, brother.
0
@GnaReffotsirk: Go
I just like to play devil's advocate against religious people. I place my trust in things that can be measured in several ways, from which data can be gathered, etc. I also place my trust in explanations that can be verified by experimentation/duplicated by any curious individual. If there are multiple verifiable explanations, I apportion my trust according to the amount of data supporting each explanation. I do not place my trust in things for which there is little evidence to support. Technically, in the absence of measurements/verifiability, all speculations remain possible and have equal probability of being true and untrue (uniform probability distribution), until technology allows us to make better measurements and helps further experimentation. As a philosophical thought game, it is fun to discuss possibilities of speculations to be true and false and the implications.
How do you know that the Pythagorean view of the universe isn't the truth? Everything appears to be defined by numerical values, hence everything is literally made of numbers.
Democritus, an ancient Greek pagan, apparently "prophesized the existence of the atom", but no one ever calls him a prophet.
You've never experienced the Flying Spaghetti Monster because your faith in him is not strong enough. Once you open your mind to his noodliness, he will grant you your own pasta strainer pirate hat.
On a side note, no one can really disprove that Clint Eastwood actually spoke with Invisible Obama.
0
The battleship gave me of the idea of the HMS Thunderchild fighting a protoss colossus.
0
@EternalWraith: Go
You don't see the hypocrisies in your inconsistent interpretations of Bronze Age folklore? You are making literal interpretations one moment, then twisting words/meanings the next moment. If you haven't seen god's penis, then you can't really be sure "he" is the correct pronoun to use. More truth exists in evolution than in creationism. Humans have a lot in common with chimps, as well as the rest of the animal kingdom: conflicts over resources, territory, mates, etc.
The Holy Church of Ceiling Cat is obviously the only one and true religion. How could any force stand against his mighty army of Bread Cat Minions and Peek-a-Boo Kittens? Ceiling Cat maded dem hoomons to be survantz to catz everywherez.
0
@GnaReffotsirk: Go
Because of the electrons' quantized energy states. If the multiverse hypothesis is correct, a parallel earth would indeed exist with red atmosphere because the electron's properties in that universe are slightly different. If multiverse is correct, there would also be universes in which parameters are so different that life would never have developed, let alone matter coming into existence. Science is always about finding why something works the way it does; hence research into physics. When ever you ask why and science can't explain why, you automatically cite it as proof of divine intention, when in reality science can't explain why because of technological limitations; just like when the technology wasn't available in 5000 BC to help explain that eclipses weren't the results of demons swallowing the sun. We currently do not have the technology to detect other universes, hence multiverse remains a hypothesis, just as is your definition of a omnipotent divinity. As technology advances, new tools will allow science to explain why. You can't be more honest and sincere than a scientist who is trying to discover why the universe works the way it does and trying to disseminate the findings to the public. Religion only requires blind faith/trust in doctrine and dogma. Religious people often take offense when science finds something that contradicts and invalidates religious beliefs; religious people view science as an affront on their religion. Many religious people assume humans have a soul, that there is an afterlife, etc, but science has yet to find any evidence to support those hypotheses.
Weren't you trying to show that god's genocides were plans to avoid a greater evil?
If you can misrepresent/misunderstand my point of view, which is written in modern English, and we are both from the United States, why would you think you can understand the biblical stories, which were originally written in ancient Hebrew dialect, then translated to Greek, then translated to Latin, then translated to old English?
The chances of finding god is that same as finding the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It's really quit dishonest to tell people to trust in something that may not even exist. It's also quite dishonest to say that the unknown is unknowable because of divine intention.
0
@GnaReffotsirk: Go "We can only trust. And this is where faith comes in. "
Right, because faith is defined as believing in something for which there is zero factual evidence supporting it (i.e. faith in god, faith in afterlife, faith in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, etc.) You seem to be attributing the occurrence of events as the action of a conscious omnipotent being, and of course, you don't have any evidence for this. If your defense, you would probably say that humans cannot understand because it is beyond their comprehension, a totally lazy and vague attempt at explanation.
In reality, your speculation that events are ultimately controlled and connected to a greater purpose, is misconception of coincidence, randomness, and probability.
When an event, usually traumatizing, occurs, people have a natural tendency/curiosity to understand why it happened, they tend to seek what ever explanation gives them the most comfort because of the brain's need for endorphins. It's easiest for those people to turn to speculation/religion/conspiracies/etc when the facts contradict their own relative perceptions of the reality of the events. That's why so many religious people attribute disasters to wrath of god, instead of to failed policies to prepare for disasters, or blindness in heeding the evidence of pre-disaster warnings. Lack of understanding/inability to understand the factual evidence leads to faith in religious explanations. Advances in science and technology have allowed us to comprehend so many things (i.e. materials science, quantum mechanics, relativity).
"Why is the sky blue?"
"Because god is the decider."
"Wrong. The sky is blue because the gas molecules in the atmosphere causes light to "scatter". The blue spectrum of light has enough energy to excite the electrons in the molecules. When the electrons go back to the ground state, the energy is re-emitted back as blue light."
"How do you know this?"
"Because of scientific experiments."
"Why does the moon orbit the earth?"
"Because it's the moon's punishment for stealing cheese from the sun."
"Gravity..."
0
@GnaReffotsirk: Go
Which is why NOT the entire nation believes in hocus pocus biblical stories. Those stories have as much fact as historical fiction at best. A lot of Germans, one might even say the entire nation, believed in "Mein Kampf", another book that was written so strongly, and look at the outcome. The whole world also used to believe the sun and the moon chased each other around earth, explaining why the sun and moon rarely appear in the sky together, and that the stars revolved around earth, proving that earth was the center of the universe.