I only dragged in Jon Stewart because of his poll statement and the statement you made about knowing someone and how someone else could interpret your personal experience to invalidate a properly conducted poll (if the poll was properly conducted). Unfortunately, the majority of religious people tend to view their own doctrines as the only truth, which makes them close-minded to other possibilities/explanations. It would be nice to drag in graphs and data tables for people to see, but you'd have to browse through the research archives to find the correct journal. It's tough to find an archive where you don't need to have a subscription account.
Jon Stewart: "Polls are still showing the African American support for Mitt Romney is zero percent. That poll, you my friend are the margin of error. How? What is going on?"
Herman Cain: "..I am not a zero. I know a lot of black conservatives that are going to vote for Mitt Romney. The polls are inaccurate in my opinion based upon anecdotal, based upon people that I know..."
Jon Setwart: "...From what I understand, that's why they do polls."
Polls and studies actually do show that non-religious people understand science far better than religious people; in fact, most physicists and other scientists are not religious. Non-religious people also know more about the various religions than religious people. The only elitism is religious people claiming that their view of the universe is the only truth, especially when they lack verifiable evidence to support their claim. The same thing happens with conspiracy hypothesists. When science invalidates their arguments, somehow scientists are part of a conspiracy against religion.
There's a definite correlation between physicists and other scientists and their "nonreligiousness". There's also data to support that genetics and environmental factors influence the growth and development of the brain, which influences individual behaviors and personalities, including thought patterns, perception of their surroundings, and preferences to religion.
Of course YOU and other like-minded individuals wouldn't understand; just like how many religious individuals don't comprehend quantum mechanics and relativity, let alone Newtonian physics and calculus, or even simple algebra. The combination of your genetics and environmental affects have culminated in an individual (YOU) that cannot comprehend the difference between scientific fact/evidence and make-believe religious stories. You obviously do not understand the evolution theory or the methods and experiments used to test the theory; as such, you are a liar, which is probably a sin in your religion. But you conveniently ignore that, right? Moreover, religious people are quite prideful (another sin?) in believing that they know the truth. As such, you keep ignoring the flaws in religious stories and/or conveniently twist the meanings of religious passages the way a politician plays with words. You have "the forked tongue of a serpent", not that there's anything wrong with snakes or reptiles, unless you believe in that genesis story or a follower of David Ickes. The evolution theory is the most likely explanation for the diversity of life because it has withstood so much methodical scrutiny.
Let's talking about the flaws in the belief of your god. Where are the original ten commandments, supposedly made by that god? Where is the boat that god supposedly told a neolithic human to engineer? Where is the staff that god supposedly magically turned into a snake? Where is the eden garden? Where is the magical burning talking bush? Where is Ezekiel's wheel? Where are Joseph Smith's golden tablets? Do you seriously believe the earth and all life on it were created in 7 days (168 hours)? If you like democracy, why did polytheist pagan Greeks come up with democracy? Why has Buddhism lasted 2600 years (600 years more than christianity)? Why has Vedism lasted 3500 years (1500 years more than christianity)? Why does an omnipotent god need human (that have to be contacted by a bureaucracy of angles and have to pass examinations) to spread religion through conquest and forced conversions? Why doesn't your bible explain why the sun emits light, why gravity exists, or why humans can survive explsure to alpha radiation, but not gamma radiation?
Well, this is embarrassing, but when I try to export to .m3, and try to view it in the editor, it's empty, no model. I don't even see the gray sphere. I'm using 3DS Max 9 and trying to understand why it's not exporting properly/not showing up.
I don't know if this is relevant to the problem, but when I imported the models into 3DS Max for manipulation, I had to uncheck Animate Objects because it kept giving me "Import Failed: Unknown property: 'position' in undefined."
You can use 3D Ripper DX to get the meshes (no animation, no bones) and textures. The meshes won't be exact, but close enough. You also have to remove the terrain meshes and find out which textures belong to which meshes.
0
@Gradius12: Go
"The people at that extreme are arrogant, lifeless, and devoid of creativity." <- Hipsters?
0
@TassadarCW: Go
Were you able to export animations from 3DS Max 9 using 1.7b?
0
@Deadzergling: Go
I only dragged in Jon Stewart because of his poll statement and the statement you made about knowing someone and how someone else could interpret your personal experience to invalidate a properly conducted poll (if the poll was properly conducted). Unfortunately, the majority of religious people tend to view their own doctrines as the only truth, which makes them close-minded to other possibilities/explanations. It would be nice to drag in graphs and data tables for people to see, but you'd have to browse through the research archives to find the correct journal. It's tough to find an archive where you don't need to have a subscription account.
0
@Deadzergling: Go
I didn't say all religious people were ALWAYS dumb; they have a tendency to be dumb; everything has outliers and anomalies. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/28/nation/la-na-religion-survey-20100928
Jon Stewart: "Polls are still showing the African American support for Mitt Romney is zero percent. That poll, you my friend are the margin of error. How? What is going on?"
Herman Cain: "..I am not a zero. I know a lot of black conservatives that are going to vote for Mitt Romney. The polls are inaccurate in my opinion based upon anecdotal, based upon people that I know..."
Jon Setwart: "...From what I understand, that's why they do polls."
0
@Hookah604: Go
Epic.
0
@Deadzergling: Go
Polls and studies actually do show that non-religious people understand science far better than religious people; in fact, most physicists and other scientists are not religious. Non-religious people also know more about the various religions than religious people. The only elitism is religious people claiming that their view of the universe is the only truth, especially when they lack verifiable evidence to support their claim. The same thing happens with conspiracy hypothesists. When science invalidates their arguments, somehow scientists are part of a conspiracy against religion.
There's a definite correlation between physicists and other scientists and their "nonreligiousness". There's also data to support that genetics and environmental factors influence the growth and development of the brain, which influences individual behaviors and personalities, including thought patterns, perception of their surroundings, and preferences to religion.
0
@EternalWraith: Go
Of course YOU and other like-minded individuals wouldn't understand; just like how many religious individuals don't comprehend quantum mechanics and relativity, let alone Newtonian physics and calculus, or even simple algebra. The combination of your genetics and environmental affects have culminated in an individual (YOU) that cannot comprehend the difference between scientific fact/evidence and make-believe religious stories. You obviously do not understand the evolution theory or the methods and experiments used to test the theory; as such, you are a liar, which is probably a sin in your religion. But you conveniently ignore that, right? Moreover, religious people are quite prideful (another sin?) in believing that they know the truth. As such, you keep ignoring the flaws in religious stories and/or conveniently twist the meanings of religious passages the way a politician plays with words. You have "the forked tongue of a serpent", not that there's anything wrong with snakes or reptiles, unless you believe in that genesis story or a follower of David Ickes. The evolution theory is the most likely explanation for the diversity of life because it has withstood so much methodical scrutiny.
Let's talking about the flaws in the belief of your god. Where are the original ten commandments, supposedly made by that god? Where is the boat that god supposedly told a neolithic human to engineer? Where is the staff that god supposedly magically turned into a snake? Where is the eden garden? Where is the magical burning talking bush? Where is Ezekiel's wheel? Where are Joseph Smith's golden tablets? Do you seriously believe the earth and all life on it were created in 7 days (168 hours)? If you like democracy, why did polytheist pagan Greeks come up with democracy? Why has Buddhism lasted 2600 years (600 years more than christianity)? Why has Vedism lasted 3500 years (1500 years more than christianity)? Why does an omnipotent god need human (that have to be contacted by a bureaucracy of angles and have to pass examinations) to spread religion through conquest and forced conversions? Why doesn't your bible explain why the sun emits light, why gravity exists, or why humans can survive explsure to alpha radiation, but not gamma radiation?
0
RIP Chris Stevens
0
I listen to either NPR or Brood War soundtrack.
Mister Rogers and Bob Ross got autotuned.
0
@EternalWraith: Go
Homo habilis, Homo floresiensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, etc...
0
@Leruster: Go
Ah! Thank you!
I updated the 3DS Max file with the material and uploaded the m3 file: http://www.sc2mapster.com/assets/devourer3dsmaxmodel/files/
I just noticed that I still have to edit parts of the larva segments to fix the "see through" problem.
0
@Leruster: Go
I converted the model to mesh and poly, but it's still not showing up in the editor/.m3 file. What is the StarCraft II Material?
0
@Zarxiel93: Go
Well, this is embarrassing, but when I try to export to .m3, and try to view it in the editor, it's empty, no model. I don't even see the gray sphere. I'm using 3DS Max 9 and trying to understand why it's not exporting properly/not showing up.
I don't know if this is relevant to the problem, but when I imported the models into 3DS Max for manipulation, I had to uncheck Animate Objects because it kept giving me "Import Failed: Unknown property: 'position' in undefined."
0
@Zarxiel93: Go
Are you having trouble with the map editor? Can you see the model in 3DS Max or any program that can open and edit .max files?
0
You can use 3D Ripper DX to get the meshes (no animation, no bones) and textures. The meshes won't be exact, but close enough. You also have to remove the terrain meshes and find out which textures belong to which meshes.