Is there some setting I'm not seeing somewhere? When I click a forum thread title, I am always taken to the last page, the last post. Really quite irritating if it's a thread I've not yet ever read. I can manually go to the last page, the last post by clicking the apporpriate column over towards the right, but if I click the title, I expect to be taken to the beginiing og the discussion.
You can click the page you want to go to before entering the thread (it shows the page numbers if there's more then one).
Meh, I've seen weirder thread organizations anyway, like on OCremix where all threads are actually organized backwards (page 1 leads you to the latest page, the last page is actually the first).
Well that's pretty much what they're trying to do, get the thread locked. Though it's not like most people haven't already dealt with this sort of thing before anyway.
So did I, but I'm sorry if the topic of this conversation isn't macho enough for you, good luck with the whole "prepare him to die" thing, I trust he'll be a fine young cadet. As for being a flag, I was merely going along with the implications of your theory, and of course the implications of "proper" breeding children with completely defined gender roles (which homosexuality would unfortunately defy in this societal model (as with anything that is labeled as feminine that boy may perhaps find interest in), no offense to your family intended) - best regards to you and your future endeavors.
Because it's not socially acceptable if it's not preparing young children for the military and the future prospect of war correct, unless they're gay of course - nope, can't have the homosexual in the military now can we? And that is why we must make a distinction here, since of COURSE the males should only be prepped to die for their country while the women only prepped for child bearing - we mustn't have the gender distinctions disturbed, for the sake of the future!
I watched a couple episodes. It didn't seem interesting to me. But it seems to me people are overly-obsessed with it. What's that word for "Narutard" but for pony-lovers?
0
You can click the page you want to go to before entering the thread (it shows the page numbers if there's more then one). Meh, I've seen weirder thread organizations anyway, like on OCremix where all threads are actually organized backwards (page 1 leads you to the latest page, the last page is actually the first).
0
For some weird reason all the male ones have flat heads (more or less actually resemble horse heads)
0
http://blog.jitbit.com/2011/04/chinese-magic-drive.html
I feel sorry for the people getting ripped off because of this, but it's kinda funny
0
Please for the sake of the thread ignore the above poster
0
@wOlfLisK: Go
Well that's pretty much what they're trying to do, get the thread locked. Though it's not like most people haven't already dealt with this sort of thing before anyway.
0
@Born2Party
Well I see you've gotten tired of pretending to be a pedophile and have switched to method two, calling everyone else pedophiles
Tired yet?
0
He's a 40 year old named Nigel
0
Trust me, we've noticed. Not the first, not the last haha
0
@Born2Party: Go
Obviously your attempts here have failed. Thank you come again
0
@Born2Party: Go
You attracted young boys with my little pony? At that age I'd change the TV if so much as a commercial came on that was with something girly
0
meh, if only their newest album had the same sort of energy as their old ones
0
@Malpheus: Go
So did I, but I'm sorry if the topic of this conversation isn't macho enough for you, good luck with the whole "prepare him to die" thing, I trust he'll be a fine young cadet. As for being a flag, I was merely going along with the implications of your theory, and of course the implications of "proper" breeding children with completely defined gender roles (which homosexuality would unfortunately defy in this societal model (as with anything that is labeled as feminine that boy may perhaps find interest in), no offense to your family intended) - best regards to you and your future endeavors.
0
@Malpheus: Go
Because it's not socially acceptable if it's not preparing young children for the military and the future prospect of war correct, unless they're gay of course - nope, can't have the homosexual in the military now can we? And that is why we must make a distinction here, since of COURSE the males should only be prepped to die for their country while the women only prepped for child bearing - we mustn't have the gender distinctions disturbed, for the sake of the future!
(see, I can use sarcasm to make a point too!)
0
You are completely entitled to your opinion, but what exactly did that post accomplish, aside for wasting few more seconds of your life typing it?
0
Most prefer to go by Brony