SC2Mapster

when 4 player leave you cannot win survival t.t

when ordering the specialist after hide he does not execute the command directly. instead he first shoots at a random target.

im merely pointing out things that need improvement. no offence. the map is quite fun.

a few other points:

-specialist has no indication of how many levels of oc sers is active

-the difficulty jump from picking up crystals to defending the time machine is to large

-people tend to go afk while loading and/or picking. resulting in leaving of other players. resulting in a new game. thats what i meant with getting stuck. you just get stuck when someone does not pick.

ps: i followed the tutorial. in fact it was the first time i did so.. and died. not of the instructions but cause my specialist decided to cliffjump into enemys while charging the beam. looked quite fun :)

i really dont get that item system.. items are disappearing sometimes. why is that? and the inventory is a mess itself. and how many skillpoints are saved? i had 1-4-10 last game started a new one and got 1-0-4 so its 20% or what?

btw know how you spot major design flawes? when you are stuck on a loading screen. when you are stuck on a black screen. or when you are stuck because a assassin or specialist died at beginning. NOTHING you can do to rescue him. gj

tbh.. i cant understand a word from the voice actors. its so awfully distorted. other things i dislike: you cant see what others picked at start. the inventory is really unhandy. the 3 leveling up ways are not having a great impact

i would like a decent a&a. as i said there is allready a (imo poorly designed) monopoly.(author: irusvirus) on EU. i would also like to see a stratego, 7 wonders or maybe a thunderstone. but i am getting off topic here. maybe i should do one myself =)

anyway i wish you good luck with your map. maybe i will play it sometime when it is on eu :)

i allready played one for sc2. it was bugged, but i didnt care cause the basic game idea is retarded beyond believe. you roll dice, you buy or pay. next player. thats like playing a tower defense where your tower already spawn in the right place when you push a button.

dont get me wrong, it is sure a good practise to convert it to a sc2 editor, however the concept is not suited for online play IN a real time strategy environment. like most boardgames it makes only fun when you see your opponents and interact with them socially.

interesting.. yes it is my oppinion. and the oppinion of the rest of the friggin boardgamecommunity. only because it is of the same age as a dinosaur and sold 7 trillion copies, it isnt the most popular boardgame in existence. thats chess afterall.

so to summarize this: i have respect of your work and i appreciate your contibution to the community, the question was just why you have chosen a stupid simple boardgame over a simple good boardgame. and there are many of that to chose from. just browse the listed site a bit when you are not familiar with boardgames.

of all the good boardgames out there, everyone is just picking monopoly or risk. and monopoly is really one of the shittiest boardgames i played. so why everyone picks that?

puppies

Do want!

"nig* and guy: "two words which by themselves can be harmless but which together form a verbal missile of hate"

by Randy Marsh

man this becomes a total new meaning in this map..

i have seen amazing games too which allowed to switch servers. back in those days they were called starcraft and warcraft

you are beeing reduntant.. and annoying. back that up with some facts maybe and we could discuss. this however is just written gibberish.

politicans dont have the right to get like 10k diets. yet they do. do they ethicaly have the right to judge on homosexual marriage? why do top athlets get millions of dollars. is this ethically right? huh weird..

"I don't use their service because it sucks. Besides don't change the subject, this has nothing to do with any services provided by Blizzard." you are so hillarious xD why are you on sc2mapster again when you dont use anything from blizzard?

@Colt556: Go proper forum etiquette? doubling the amount of text is proper forum etiquette.. well that is new to me. i always assumed i can insert reply marker so people don´t get confused to what i replied. silly me.

valve did not legally copywrite dota. they are attempting to trademark the name dota. "attempting" means nothing happened yet.

ethical aside it is fact that they can write the tos however they feel.. someone check the wc1 tos. maybe we resigned our souls allready to blizzard?

now lets see and wait what happenes.. oh btw. the german telekom wanted to "trademark" the letter T. they sued a smaller company and lost :>

@Colt556: Go

first of all: dont quote whats directly above your post. it makes you look stupid. second: better read the terms of service of the wc3 editor again. thirdly: it IS true, it IS their right. thats what terms of service are for. quotation wikipedia:

Terms of service (abbreviated as ToS or TOS)[1] are rules by which one must agree to abide by in order to use a service. Unless in violation of consumer protection laws, such terms are usually legally binding.

you want to use the editor? didnt you agree to this rules? you dont want to agree to this rules you cant use the editor. its really simple. you can make a flash programm with the same TOS. its your right and you could own everything created with it. however nothing would be created with it, because there are alternatives. whoops.

end of discussion. you have no point.

man colt.. do you know what you are talking about or are you just living in your happy baby world? everything created with the blizzard editor is owned by blizzard. if you use it you give up every right for the creation. they have the right to it. no discussion.