I am looking for someone to edit some models for my RTC entry "Doodad Hunt 2". What I need done is as follows
- Edit the Walkable Plane on a Model
- Perform minor alterations to a few models (rotations etc)
- Create a Model Camera with the correct dimensions that can be used in the project with the Render-To-Texture feature.
Payment will be based on if the project wins the contest and how much prize money it receives. The percentage you will receive shall be 5% of all winnings.
And by the very nature of how you are responding I get the feeling my statement rang true for you.
Besides, Ive heard the statement "I dont create mods anymore for SC2 because I dont really get anything out of it" in relation to money and modding on this forum time and time again, so it actually applies to quite a few people.
So I am not allowed to criticize you essentially judging everyone as "greedy" without then being labelled greedy myself? How is that in anyway logical? Perhaps you should consider that fact that I may simply be defending against stereotypes/labels that are extremely detrimental to progress, such as what you said.
I don't doubt that it may apply to some, but it does not apply to all. The point is that when the time comes, those who are greedy will/should be cast out and NOT supported. Those that offer a good amount of fun content for a reasonable/low price should be supported and are not greedy.
It is unbelievable to me that modders get shit for this when nobody says jack about youtubers, e-sports players and streamers getting paid. Am I saying they do it for the money? No, but what I am saying is that when they do get offered money people don't suddenly backlash against them for no damn reason and classify them as greedy.
Ok so you're against all forms of DLC, you obviously have a bias so how about you don't sit there and judge the rest of us as greedy humans who will obviously not use money to our advantage in order to make our creations better.
Steam did not prove jack, just because some modders decided to be assholes does not mean all of them did. I'm sure you didn't even take the time to notice that a great majority of the mods offered in the Skyrim mod fiasco were "pay what you want" rather being put behind a paywall.
Greed is part of human nature, and there is no denying that. Be it killing other animals for person gain (food, profit, you name it) or using other living things (even your relatives) to further your own life through profit. The enlightened few which actually think beyond that are in the minority and are also usually those who end up being exploited. Quote:
A few people have been making some free stuff. There is a reason I play SC2 only every few months and that is because new stuff worth playing only comes out every few months. Half of those (the good ones) would probably switch to paid stuff if they could leaving nothing good being free.
If there is even a small minority of people who do not meet the criteria of being classified as "greedy" then that defeats the whole label of "human nature". It's not human nature, you could however say it is a widespread personality flaw, and personalities are shaped by ones experiences and interpretations.
Depending on how Blizard curates the paid content, I don't think this will be an issue. However, let's assume that what you think will happen does in fact occur and all the new good games are not free. Well, for one they will be even better than they would if they were free due to having funding for more time and the development of assets. Secondly, I'm sure like most people you've purchased hearthstone packs, heroes/skins or have no problem with picking up the SC2 mission packs?
The price for paid mods will likely be very low and much more cost effective/give more bang for buck than anything of those things I listed above so, I personally would embrace it rather than fear it.
By the very nature of what you're saying, it literally applies to nobody, as all of us have been making stuff for free with no cash incentives. The only thing that suddenly introducing money into the mix would do is allow for more dedicated development time, custom assets etc.
greed is everywhere, it's human nature
i don't really think taking off maps would be positiv for the mapmaker, ppl would remake it or they are already remaked and those will become more popular then. the opposite is true. you can use popular maps to promote your DLC content or make them vote for you in contests like RTC.
Please don't go around presuming to know how every persons personality/mind works. Greed is a choice and is not "human nature" as say something like "sex" would be human nature.
Piece of cake, well, piece of "full-time dedication" cake at least. I am talking 8-12 hours a day for 1-2 months straight and I can guarantee you that the game would be done or at least 90% finished.
depending on how complex the map might be, a year is too short. would need some full time guys to make it.
It could easily be done in about a month or two with full-time work/dedication. The only problem is that is quite expensive and I don't know if he is willing to shed that kind of money out for this.
0
I am looking for someone to edit some models for my RTC entry "Doodad Hunt 2". What I need done is as follows
- Edit the Walkable Plane on a Model
- Perform minor alterations to a few models (rotations etc)
- Create a Model Camera with the correct dimensions that can be used in the project with the Render-To-Texture feature.
Payment will be based on if the project wins the contest and how much prize money it receives. The percentage you will receive shall be 5% of all winnings.
If you're interested, leave a reply or PM me.
0
So I am not allowed to criticize you essentially judging everyone as "greedy" without then being labelled greedy myself? How is that in anyway logical? Perhaps you should consider that fact that I may simply be defending against stereotypes/labels that are extremely detrimental to progress, such as what you said.
I don't doubt that it may apply to some, but it does not apply to all. The point is that when the time comes, those who are greedy will/should be cast out and NOT supported. Those that offer a good amount of fun content for a reasonable/low price should be supported and are not greedy.
It is unbelievable to me that modders get shit for this when nobody says jack about youtubers, e-sports players and streamers getting paid. Am I saying they do it for the money? No, but what I am saying is that when they do get offered money people don't suddenly backlash against them for no damn reason and classify them as greedy.
0
@ImperialGood: Go
Ok so you're against all forms of DLC, you obviously have a bias so how about you don't sit there and judge the rest of us as greedy humans who will obviously not use money to our advantage in order to make our creations better.
Steam did not prove jack, just because some modders decided to be assholes does not mean all of them did. I'm sure you didn't even take the time to notice that a great majority of the mods offered in the Skyrim mod fiasco were "pay what you want" rather being put behind a paywall.
0
If there is even a small minority of people who do not meet the criteria of being classified as "greedy" then that defeats the whole label of "human nature". It's not human nature, you could however say it is a widespread personality flaw, and personalities are shaped by ones experiences and interpretations.
Depending on how Blizard curates the paid content, I don't think this will be an issue. However, let's assume that what you think will happen does in fact occur and all the new good games are not free. Well, for one they will be even better than they would if they were free due to having funding for more time and the development of assets. Secondly, I'm sure like most people you've purchased hearthstone packs, heroes/skins or have no problem with picking up the SC2 mission packs?
The price for paid mods will likely be very low and much more cost effective/give more bang for buck than anything of those things I listed above so, I personally would embrace it rather than fear it.
0
@Crainy: Go
By the very nature of what you're saying, it literally applies to nobody, as all of us have been making stuff for free with no cash incentives. The only thing that suddenly introducing money into the mix would do is allow for more dedicated development time, custom assets etc.
Please don't go around presuming to know how every persons personality/mind works. Greed is a choice and is not "human nature" as say something like "sex" would be human nature.
0
@FunkyUserName: Go
Piece of cake, well, piece of "full-time dedication" cake at least. I am talking 8-12 hours a day for 1-2 months straight and I can guarantee you that the game would be done or at least 90% finished.
0
It could easily be done in about a month or two with full-time work/dedication. The only problem is that is quite expensive and I don't know if he is willing to shed that kind of money out for this.
0
I would definitely undertake this if it wasn't for the fact that I would need some sort of funding to do so, and I don't wanna be that guy.
0
Going to need all the marketing you can get considering Void comes out on the same day as Fallout 4.
0
I meant the roots of the game (and other dotas) were born from Blizzards custom game/modding scene.
As a result, one would imagine that they have a sort of "special place in their hearts" type of relationship with mods/arcade.
0
Its an alternative to Kickstarter where people pledge money and you deliver content, and nope, its not working.
Apparently my work is not worth much >.<
0
I would think the Heroes team would share a similar goal since Heroes would not exist without the Arcade/Modding scene.
0
@TheSkunk2: Go
Can you just not update the mod to 1.2?
IIRC You don't have to update a mod to the most recent version as the map will use the previous stored since it is stored.
0
@Crainy: Go
Does it only show up on low settings?
0
@Traysent: Go
I just tried a couple times with no luck, same error as before.