SC2Mapster

So since when has this been here? http://wiki.sc2mapster.com/ An actual proper wiki, it looks so much nicer.

Edit: Looking at the mainpage history, it looks like since 12th of march.

Nothing to see here, move along.

On a more serious note: It was set up recently, and we (DrSuperEvil mostly) have been moving pages over there, but it's slow. The wiki is not ready yet and the "weird" one we have had up to now is still better due to it actually having content. We're still messing around with how we're gonna organise things and so on, so people, please don't touch anything unless one of the other mods (Im about to log off) gives the green light.

It looks much more inviting when it comes to adding stuff to it :)

Quote from zeldarules28: Go

So this begs the question...How in the world did you find that? Were you just testing out random url's until something worked? Or are you a spy who broke into our secret hideout? :P

The wiki.sc2mapster.com link was used to redirect to the sc2mapster.com/wiki, I think. I got there from:

Quote from vjeux: Go

You've been making great tutorials and the forum is not really good to show more than 10 tutorials. This is why I've setup a sorted listing of all the tutorials on the wiki.

Comprehensive listing of all tutorials

When you post a new tutorial, please edit that wiki in order to keep it up to date!

Quote from zeldarules28: Go

hold your horses

On a serious note... Everyone should stay away from the new Wiki until it's ready. Messing with it will only delay the ETA of it's release, and cause more work for us.

Thanks

You guys need to add a Cutscene Editor Section. But I'm glad this is happening.

I wrote a piece on the Conversation data type.

http://wiki.sc2mapster.com/Data/Campaign/Conversations http://wiki.sc2mapster.com/Data/Campaign/Conversation_States http://wiki.sc2mapster.com/Data/Campaign/Characters

I could not find a template for data (only for triggers). Is this the appropriate way to write the wiki? I have seen a lot of bullet lists, is that the prefered way of writing?

I have been thinking about writing some overview tutorials on how to work with AI, difficulty and dialogs. If I would add them to the new wiki they would be updatable by other users, in case things change. They would also get a unified formatting ( the tutorials in the forum section look very different from each other). Should I write these tutorials into the new wiki or in the tutorials forum?

The wiki default text color should not be white, a gray color is better. If the bold text would be made white then it would pop out a lot more.

The level 3 and 4 headers look almost the same. If level 4 headers would be made non-bold they would be easier to differentiate.

Thank you guys for doing this, it's been an amazing help for me. Hopefully I can give back to this community as I get better.

The banners seems to have been adjusted to their proper location. Now I have some other comments:

• The Brown/orange color of external links is a bit dark. It's hard to see in a bright environment.
• The page-content box should have a fixed width, same as the banner. Depending on the window size it sometimes pushes all content down by the distance of its height.
• I'm also wondering if it would be ok to remove the Blizzard category in tutorials, integrate them into the others and split the Trigger section into two parts.

Edit: I removed the bullets from the tutorials page and replaced them with br elements, this makes the Icons pop out much more. It can be reversed through history.