so after they announced the game in april 2007 with build 3626 they didnt release it because they were taking 3 months of to add foliage, and 3 more months to add scorch marks?! and then taking 3 more years to polish it TWO times?! lol you suck blizzard, fuck you
Flame on. This is the ENGINE development path. Once the game engine itself is finalized, priorities can move on to Battle.net 2.0, the campaign, arcade-style scripting (ie. Galaxy), the list goes on. You try making the followup to Starcraft 1 and let's see how that goes.
you really thought battle.net 2.0 was something worth working on? LOL, bnet 2.0 sucks, what is it anyway really? just a way to chat with people on wow and diablo 3, its nothing really groundbraking, they didnt even need to announce it, it was just a battle.net thats all.
so after they announced the game in april 2007 with build 3626 they didnt release it because they were taking 3 months of to add foliage, and 3 more months to add scorch marks?! and then taking 3 more years to polish it TWO times?! lol you suck blizzard, fuck you
lawl that was my video recorded during Blizzon and hosted on Mapster, it has come full circle
so after they announced the game in april 2007 with build 3626 they didnt release it because they were taking 3 months of to add foliage, and 3 more months to add scorch marks?! and then taking 3 more years to polish it TWO times?! lol you suck blizzard, fuck you
Sounds like you have no idea how the development of a big game like Starcraft 2 works and that you're posting this just to flame blizzard and battle.net 2.0.
Honestly, I think battle.net is getting quite good. Blizzard has really stepped up their game lately in several areas and I think I prefer this battle.net to the one in WC3. Sure the SC2 battle.net has several cons, but I think it is an improvement to WC3's battle.net in many ways.
@Roma420: Go Some of the old models are going to be used in the campaign. Through all the teasers I saw the Predator ship, and the Mutant Larva Queens used to spawn before they changed it to the current inject larvae ability, and the Oracle itself uses an old model.
I too wish we would get them all, but maybe they decided to hold them just in case they were needed later, and some of them already found a new use. From their point of view these units wouldn't be as interesting if the community had used their models since WoL release, specially the Oracle model, players would say "aahh it's just that old Statis Orb model we see in a hundred custom maps".
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
so after they announced the game in april 2007 with build 3626 they didnt release it because they were taking 3 months of to add foliage, and 3 more months to add scorch marks?! and then taking 3 more years to polish it TWO times?! lol you suck blizzard, fuck you
Flame on. This is the ENGINE development path. Once the game engine itself is finalized, priorities can move on to Battle.net 2.0, the campaign, arcade-style scripting (ie. Galaxy), the list goes on. You try making the followup to Starcraft 1 and let's see how that goes.
@MotiveMe: Go
you really thought battle.net 2.0 was something worth working on? LOL, bnet 2.0 sucks, what is it anyway really? just a way to chat with people on wow and diablo 3, its nothing really groundbraking, they didnt even need to announce it, it was just a battle.net thats all.
Polishing is a pain.
It would be nice if blizzard would release for us those early build models!
@Hookah604: Go
omg i know! srsly i LOVE those alpha models, if they release it in hots then ill surely buy it.
They've reintroduced the old physics deaths anyway.
lawl that was my video recorded during Blizzon and hosted on Mapster, it has come full circle
Sounds like you have no idea how the development of a big game like Starcraft 2 works and that you're posting this just to flame blizzard and battle.net 2.0.
Honestly, I think battle.net is getting quite good. Blizzard has really stepped up their game lately in several areas and I think I prefer this battle.net to the one in WC3. Sure the SC2 battle.net has several cons, but I think it is an improvement to WC3's battle.net in many ways.
@Roma420: Go Some of the old models are going to be used in the campaign. Through all the teasers I saw the Predator ship, and the Mutant Larva Queens used to spawn before they changed it to the current inject larvae ability, and the Oracle itself uses an old model.
I too wish we would get them all, but maybe they decided to hold them just in case they were needed later, and some of them already found a new use. From their point of view these units wouldn't be as interesting if the community had used their models since WoL release, specially the Oracle model, players would say "aahh it's just that old Statis Orb model we see in a hundred custom maps".