I have one fully developed map and would love to get some plays. Also very willing to help with the testing and balancing of other people's maps.
If I'm on and you've got a question about the editor then ask away, I'm starting to feel at least somewhat competent - here's to hoping that feeling isn't an illusion!
Updated. Make sure you think abit about your reply such as identifier & comment so we don't get alot of unvalid information in the list, because it would take a lifetime of patience to check if it's all valid. (for me)
BNET ID: TheDuke
Identifier: 146
Region: EU
SC2Mapster Nick: tmahring
Comment:
Will test maps when I'm online, and have a map to be tested. I have quite a lot of programming experience and am good with the trigger editor, however i suck with the data editor.
BNET ID: Enofel
Identifier 549
Region: USA
Sc2Mapster: Enofel
Comment: Ready to help test and give advice, also making maps from which i have completed a basic type moving on to something more complex. As time goes on, I will become more adept at using and helping others with the Sc2 Editor =D
Adding myself to the list, any testing, balancing etc., also anyone who just wants to play
BNET ID: Tortuga
Identifier: 826
MapsterNick: marcxdid
Region: USA
BnetNick: Chamenas
Identifier: 261
MapsterNick: Chamenas
Comment: Willing to test maps if I'm not doing ladder. If I'm busy, I'm busy, doesn't mean I don't wish to test your map though. Patience is key.
Region: USA
Hey eagle sight... what do you think about a couple other features for this thread? It occurred to me that there are likely going to be people that are hunting for testers w/ out being willing to test other maps themselves. So, some sort of rating system? It sounds trashy and cliche, but I think it could help this aspect of the community become more productive. So, testers would post back here with who had helped them lately and that person gets a point or some such... Hell, you could probably get Curse premium for the top rated in this aspect of the community every so often. (and if that happens, I gladly remove myself from the running since I'm suggesting it)
Similar to this, users who always request help and are never willing to help others get red (black) listed. So, testers are on the lookout for that individual and won't help him / her anymore until they begin helping the community.
I say this because I've tested for a number of people whose names I don't see on the list... We don't have a map up and ready to test yet, but when I do, I'm hoping that some of the people I tested for would be happy to test for me a bit.
Just some thoughts... lemme know what you think (everyone). :D
ALSO... you're doing a kickass job w/ this thread man. ;) Thanks again and keep it up!
Hey eagle sight... what do you think about a couple other features for this thread? It occurred to me that there are likely going to be people that are hunting for testers w/ out being willing to test other maps themselves. So, some sort of rating system? It sounds trashy and cliche, but I think it could help this aspect of the community become more productive. So, testers would post back here with who had helped them lately and that person gets a point or some such... Hell, you could probably get Curse premium for the top rated in this aspect of the community every so often. (and if that happens, I gladly remove myself from the running since I'm suggesting it)
Similar to this, users who always request help and are never willing to help others get red (black) listed. So, testers are on the lookout for that individual and won't help him / her anymore until they begin helping the community.
I say this because I've tested for a number of people whose names I don't see on the list... We don't have a map up and ready to test yet, but when I do, I'm hoping that some of the people I tested for would be happy to test for me a bit.
Just some thoughts... lemme know what you think (everyone). :D
ALSO... you're doing a kickass job w/ this thread man. ;) Thanks again and keep it up!
I think a rating system is an OK idea, however it would rise the postcount on this thread by a huge deal, also it would be alot more work. I'm thinking I could do something easy like coloring peoples nick with green if they have been vouched (as a tester) by someone - whom wrote in this thread.
About the blacklist, it would be very hard to keep track of that and trolls could just throw in a bad word for anyone.
What do you think about the green coloring? Atleast it would give people a hum about who actually helped with testing sometime.
BuuGhost#316 EU, Might not always be available, vacation ends soon, and i want some "Me" time on SC2 too, but its worth a shot :P
Oh, i do regulary AFK in sc, Not a expert at finding bugs or testing tough,
GiraffeMe 491 USA
Will test single playable RPGs on my own time. Shoot me a PM here, or on bnet.
Your friend code doesn't seem to work.
Add me:
Bravetarget || 655 || USA
I have one map near completion and need testers. I'm officially addicted to the editor, so if you have something that needs testing hit me up.
Lithe \ 585 \ USA
I have one fully developed map and would love to get some plays. Also very willing to help with the testing and balancing of other people's maps.
If I'm on and you've got a question about the editor then ask away, I'm starting to feel at least somewhat competent - here's to hoping that feeling isn't an illusion!
@bravetarget: Go
Sorry, I was looking at my achievement. :x
491 is my code and my name is GiraffeMe. Try adding me again when you get the chance, I'll be glad to test out your map.
Tried adding you, but it wouldn't work. Maybe we're doing the same thing lol.
@loki85: Go
you aren't being added for me either.
i bet it's cause you're a euro.
Add me:
Elector 231 EU
BNET ID: allenmelon
Identifier: 635
Region: US
SC2Mapster Nick: allenmelon
Comment: I will test maps (Midnight - 3AM PST)
Updated. Make sure you think abit about your reply such as identifier & comment so we don't get alot of unvalid information in the list, because it would take a lifetime of patience to check if it's all valid. (for me)
name are not case sensitive. Also, feel free to ask me feedback on map's trigger :)
BNET ID: TheDuke
Identifier: 146
Region: EU
SC2Mapster Nick: tmahring
Comment:
Will test maps when I'm online, and have a map to be tested. I have quite a lot of programming experience and am good with the trigger editor, however i suck with the data editor.
BNET ID: Enofel
Identifier 549
Region: USA
Sc2Mapster: Enofel
Comment: Ready to help test and give advice, also making maps from which i have completed a basic type moving on to something more complex. As time goes on, I will become more adept at using and helping others with the Sc2 Editor =D
BNET ID: Shovah
Identifier: 743
MapsterNick: Kuriume
Region: SEA
Comment: Will test any types of maps, very little map making knowledge
BNET ID: Ghostwalker
Identifier: 678
MapsterNick: VeridianEntropy
Region: USA
Comment: Will test any maps. Also need to have my map(s) tested. Willing to give advice on editor, although I'm a noob myself.
BnetNick: Chamenas
Identifier: 261
MapsterNick: Chamenas
Comment: Willing to test maps if I'm not doing ladder. If I'm busy, I'm busy, doesn't mean I don't wish to test your map though. Patience is key.
Region: USA
I am working on a campaign/rpg map and need testers and some help with a trigger or two. also willing to help test maps and help with anything.
Phoenix 1124
Hey eagle sight... what do you think about a couple other features for this thread? It occurred to me that there are likely going to be people that are hunting for testers w/ out being willing to test other maps themselves. So, some sort of rating system? It sounds trashy and cliche, but I think it could help this aspect of the community become more productive. So, testers would post back here with who had helped them lately and that person gets a point or some such... Hell, you could probably get Curse premium for the top rated in this aspect of the community every so often. (and if that happens, I gladly remove myself from the running since I'm suggesting it)
Similar to this, users who always request help and are never willing to help others get red (black) listed. So, testers are on the lookout for that individual and won't help him / her anymore until they begin helping the community.
I say this because I've tested for a number of people whose names I don't see on the list... We don't have a map up and ready to test yet, but when I do, I'm hoping that some of the people I tested for would be happy to test for me a bit.
Just some thoughts... lemme know what you think (everyone). :D
ALSO... you're doing a kickass job w/ this thread man. ;) Thanks again and keep it up!
Read the first post and try again.
I think a rating system is an OK idea, however it would rise the postcount on this thread by a huge deal, also it would be alot more work. I'm thinking I could do something easy like coloring peoples nick with green if they have been vouched (as a tester) by someone - whom wrote in this thread.
About the blacklist, it would be very hard to keep track of that and trolls could just throw in a bad word for anyone.
What do you think about the green coloring? Atleast it would give people a hum about who actually helped with testing sometime.
Mattavich 377 please add me EU