I am using Galaxy + + to develop a new map, as one of the first things I am investigating it is what the current practices are for storing bank files. It seems that signatures should be safe enough for my standards.
I've done some testing, but it seems that I can just go ahead and edit the bank files and the BankVerify function seems to pass without catching the edits...any reason for this?
Have come to the conclusion that text fields do not seem to change the signature at all, thus changing text fields in a bank seems not to throw any validation errors. Storing data as strings instead.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I am using Galaxy + + to develop a new map, as one of the first things I am investigating it is what the current practices are for storing bank files. It seems that signatures should be safe enough for my standards.
I've done some testing, but it seems that I can just go ahead and edit the bank files and the BankVerify function seems to pass without catching the edits...any reason for this?
Here is what I am doing:
Any help would be great, thanks.
Have come to the conclusion that text fields do not seem to change the signature at all, thus changing text fields in a bank seems not to throw any validation errors. Storing data as strings instead.