SC2Mapster Forums

General > General Chat

Sc2 development history video

  • 9 posts
    #1 Jan 25, 2013 at 06:33 UTC - 1 like

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvLsOF-c0_0

    so after they announced the game in april 2007 with build 3626 they didnt release it because they were taking 3 months of to add foliage, and 3 more months to add scorch marks?! and then taking 3 more years to polish it TWO times?! lol you suck blizzard, fuck you

    #2 Jan 25, 2013 at 07:09 UTC - 0 likes

    Flame on. This is the ENGINE development path. Once the game engine itself is finalized, priorities can move on to Battle.net 2.0, the campaign, arcade-style scripting (ie. Galaxy), the list goes on. You try making the followup to Starcraft 1 and let's see how that goes.

    CortexRP.com Creator

    #3 Jan 25, 2013 at 07:29 UTC - 0 likes

    @MotiveMe: Go

    you really thought battle.net 2.0 was something worth working on? LOL, bnet 2.0 sucks, what is it anyway really? just a way to chat with people on wow and diablo 3, its nothing really groundbraking, they didnt even need to announce it, it was just a battle.net thats all.

    #4 Jan 25, 2013 at 07:35 UTC - 0 likes

    Polishing is a pain.

    It would be nice if blizzard would release for us those early build models!

    Homepage: www.sc2goa.com

    #5 Jan 25, 2013 at 07:39 UTC - 0 likes

    @Hookah604: Go

    omg i know! srsly i LOVE those alpha models, if they release it in hots then ill surely buy it.

    #6 Jan 25, 2013 at 09:04 UTC - 0 likes

    They've reintroduced the old physics deaths anyway.

    Cyber Jorts

    #7 Jan 26, 2013 at 02:17 UTC - 0 likes
    Quote from Roma420: Go

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvLsOF-c0_0

    so after they announced the game in april 2007 with build 3626 they didnt release it because they were taking 3 months of to add foliage, and 3 more months to add scorch marks?! and then taking 3 more years to polish it TWO times?! lol you suck blizzard, fuck you

    lawl that was my video recorded during Blizzon and hosted on Mapster, it has come full circle

    #8 Jan 26, 2013 at 02:25 UTC - 0 likes
    Quote from Roma420: Go

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvLsOF-c0_0

    so after they announced the game in april 2007 with build 3626 they didnt release it because they were taking 3 months of to add foliage, and 3 more months to add scorch marks?! and then taking 3 more years to polish it TWO times?! lol you suck blizzard, fuck you

    Sounds like you have no idea how the development of a big game like Starcraft 2 works and that you're posting this just to flame blizzard and battle.net 2.0.

    Honestly, I think battle.net is getting quite good. Blizzard has really stepped up their game lately in several areas and I think I prefer this battle.net to the one in WC3. Sure the SC2 battle.net has several cons, but I think it is an improvement to WC3's battle.net in many ways.

    #9 Jan 26, 2013 at 02:29 UTC - 0 likes

    @Roma420: Go Some of the old models are going to be used in the campaign. Through all the teasers I saw the Predator ship, and the Mutant Larva Queens used to spawn before they changed it to the current inject larvae ability, and the Oracle itself uses an old model.

    I too wish we would get them all, but maybe they decided to hold them just in case they were needed later, and some of them already found a new use. From their point of view these units wouldn't be as interesting if the community had used their models since WoL release, specially the Oracle model, players would say "aahh it's just that old Statis Orb model we see in a hundred custom maps".

  • 9 posts

You must login to post a comment. Don't have an account? Register to get one!